X
Xume — Health Food Scanner SCAN · SCORE · SWAP
Get
Independent food audit · est. 2017

Scan the box. Read the truth. Swap the score.

Xume is a barcode-driven food scanner that hands you a personalized 0–100 score, flags every additive hiding in the label, and tells you exactly which similar product scores higher — usually for less money.

0–100
Personalized score
6 yrs
R&D + clinical input
4.3★
App Store · Google Play
0%
Brand override
SCAN LIVE EAN 8901234567890
HoneyGold Crunch Flakes Breakfast cereal · 375g
8 901234 567890
47/100
Mid-qualityAMBER
For your low-sugar, gluten-free profile
0REDAMBERYELLOWGREEN100
What we found
Added sugar 24g/100g 3rd ingredient
BHT preservative E321
Ultra-processed (NOVA 4) extruded grain
Whole-grain content 52% declared
OatFields Steel-Cut Oats Higher score · 18% cheaper · same aisle
84
Hidden additive detection
·
Ultra-processed flagging
·
Personalized 0–100 score
·
Just xume it
·
Allergen alerts per profile
·
Predicted taste meter
·
Cheaper, healthier swaps
·
Just xume it
·
Hidden additive detection
·
Ultra-processed flagging
·
Personalized 0–100 score
·
Just xume it
·
Allergen alerts per profile
·
Predicted taste meter
·
Cheaper, healthier swaps
·
Just xume it

Three taps from label confusion to a better cart.

Most "healthy" claims on a package are marketing. Xume strips off the front and reads what's actually in the box.

STEP 01 · Scan

Aim and scan the barcode.

Camera scanner works on any EAN/UPC. Scan in the aisle, at the warehouse, or from your pantry — no typing, no searching, no "is this the same product?" guessing.

STEP 02 · Score

Get a 0–100 personalized score.

The algorithm reads nutrition density, ingredient quality, additive load, processing level, and your dietary profile. Color code is honest: red, amber, yellow, or green.

SCORE 47 — AMBER
STEP 03 · Swap

One-tap to a higher-scoring swap.

The engine surfaces a similar product with a better score — and often a lower price. You can save it, add to your shopping list, or order from a linked store.

47 SWAP 84

Six weighted layers. Zero brand pay-to-play.

No retailer, manufacturer, or affiliate partner can move a score. The algorithm runs end-to-end without per-product human overrides — and that's the whole point.

Nutrition density

Protein, fiber, essential micronutrients per calorie — weighted against added sugars, sodium, saturated fat, and trans fats. Densities are calibrated to your goal profile, not to a one-size benchmark.

Ingredient quality & additives

Identifies E-number additives, synthetic colors, controversial preservatives (BHT, BHA, nitrites), artificial sweeteners, and any flagged carcinogen-watchlist compounds. Each penalty is transparent in the breakdown.

Ultra-processed classification (NOVA 4)

Uses the NOVA framework to tag ultra-processed items even when the front of the box reads "natural" or "wholesome." Reformulations and rebrands are picked up via label updates pushed to the database.

Allergen and diet matching

Your profile (peanut, dairy, gluten, soy, shellfish, vegan, keto, low-sugar, diabetic-friendly) reweights everything. A product that scores 78 for low-sugar may score 51 for strict keto — and the reasoning is shown.

Predicted taste meter

The honest part: a separate model predicts how palatable the product is, so you don't end up with "healthy" food no one in the house will eat. Score and taste are reported separately.

Price-aware ranking

Once a higher-scoring alternative is found, prices across linked e-commerce partners are pulled. Suggestions are ordered by score first, price second — never by affiliate commission rate.

Honest caveat: Xume rates packaged goods. Raw produce, butcher-counter meat, and bulk grains are not in the typical scope. For fresh-food logging or photo-of-meal calorie counts, pair Xume with a dedicated tracker — they solve different problems.
Score breakdown · HoneyGold Crunch Flakes
Nutrition densityprotein, fiber, micros
62
Ingredient qualityadditives, E-numbers
38
Processing (NOVA)ultra-processed = penalty
25
Allergen matchlow-sugar, gluten-free
55
Taste predictionpalatability proxy
76
Sugar loadadded vs natural
18
Composite
47/100

Built for people who read the label — and want help.

If you've ever stood in an aisle holding two cereal boxes and a granola bar wondering which one is actually less bad, you're the user.

Allergy households

The parent of three with one peanut, one gluten, one dairy.

Multi-profile support means each family member's restrictions reweight the same product differently — and the cart picks the version that clears everyone.

Saves: 15 min per aisle, three label re-reads, one ER co-pay.
Diabetic / pre-diabetic

The new T2D shopper rebuilding their pantry.

Diabetic-friendly profile penalizes free sugars, refined carbs, and ultra-processing harder. Score reweights real-time when you swap profile mid-aisle.

Catches: 41% more hidden added sugar than reading just the front of the box.
Clean-eating obsessives

The Reddit r/EatCheapAndHealthy regular.

NOVA classification + E-number penalty + taste meter pairs with their existing budget-shopping discipline. Cheaper swap surfacing actually delivers, not theoretically.

Stacks with: couponing, batch cooking, weekly meal-prep apps.
Skeptical reviewers

The journalist or shopper who distrusts NutriScore.

Full breakdown shown — every penalty visible, every weight transparent. No black-box "healthy" rating without auditable reasoning underneath.

Different from: Yuka — broader EU DB; Open Food Facts — open-source crowdsource.

A scanner, a database, a coach, and a grocery audit — in one app.

— Allergen alerts

Your allergens, weighted against every label.

Build a profile per household member. Peanut, gluten, dairy, soy, shellfish, sulphites, sesame — and the lookup goes deeper than the bold "contains" line into ambiguous ingredient names.

Contains GLUTEN
Trace DAIRY
Peanut · safe
Soy · safe
Sesame · safe
Shellfish · safe
Egg · safe
Sulphites · safe
— NOVA classification

Ultra-processed gets flagged.

The NOVA-4 framework auto-tags hyper-engineered foods even when the front of the pack says "all natural."

— Cheaper, healthier swap

The alternative engine doesn't just go fancier — it often goes cheaper.

Score-first ranking with price as a tiebreaker. You'd be surprised how often the higher score also costs less per gram, especially in cereal, snacks, and oils.

— Price across stores

Best price, surfaced.

Amazon Fresh $4.29
Instacart · Whole Foods $5.49
Walmart Pickup $4.79
Target Circle $5.19
— Twin meters

Taste vs. processing — side by side.

Taste prediction76 / 100
Processing penaltyNOVA 4
Sugar load (per 100g)24g
— Shopping list

Saved & checked.

OatFields Steel-Cut Oats
Alpro Soya Unsweetened
Hodmedod Fava Bean Crackers
Pukka Three Ginger Tea
Yeo Valley Live Yogurt 500g
— Searchable database

Search by brand, category, or score — no barcode needed.

Browsing the database directly lets you plan a shop, compare twelve cereals at once, or filter "show me green-score peanut butters under $6." Coverage is strongest in India and the US — newer European and Southeast Asian regional brands can be missing.

— Multi-profile

One household, four scores.

Switch profiles at checkout. The same product gets four different scores — and the swap engine optimizes for everyone.

Xume vs. the rest. Where it wins. Where it doesn't.

Three apps own this space — and Xume is sharper in two areas and weaker in two others. The table tells the truth.

Capability Xume Yuka Open Food Facts MyFitnessPal
Barcode → 0–100 score ✓ Personalized ✓ NutriScore ✓ Open — (calories only)
Allergen profile reweighting ✓ Per-member Partial Tag-based No
Healthier-alternative recommendation ✓ Score + price ✓ Score only No No
Price-aware swap ranking No No No
Multi-profile household ✓ Pro 1 profile No Single user
EU regional database depth Growing ✓ Strongest ✓ Open + huge Mixed
Photo-of-meal logging No No No ✓ AI scanner
Macro / calorie tracking No No Read-only ✓ Full
Open-source / community-edited Proprietary Closed app + OFF data ✓ Fully open Closed
Free tier scan limit Limited/month Unlimited Unlimited Unlimited

What people are actually saying.

★★★★★

"It effectively scores packaged foods based on their nutritional content. The user-friendly interface and helpful alternatives, complete with e-commerce links, make it a must-have for anyone looking to improve their diet."

Apoorva K. · App Store review · India
★★★★

"The concept and basic functionality is pretty good. The biggest headache is, the subscription prices — they are way too expensive for a country like India. If a monthly rate were available for the yearly subscription, conversions would be far better."

Verified Google Play user · Honest critical review · 4★
★★★★★

"Truly takes the con out of consumption. Scanned my whole pantry on day one — found two cereals I thought were 'healthy' that scored under 35, and the alternatives the engine suggested were both available cheaper at the same store."

Long-time user · 14 months · Switched from Yuka
— The full disclosure

Built in Mumbai. Sharpened over six years.

This page is independent — built by Xumeai.NET as a reference and review site, not by PlanMyFood. We want to make sure shoppers understand the strengths, the gaps, and where the algorithm is and isn't a fit.

Xume was originally launched in 2017 as PlanMyFood by a team based out of Nariman Point, Mumbai. The brand rebranded to Xume to match a sharper product story — barcode in, score out, swap suggested. The publisher, PlanMyFood Pvt Ltd, runs the scoring engine, the database, and the e-commerce-partner price feeds. For the official link and company information, visit PlanMyFood on Google Play.

The core claim — "6 years of R&D with doctors, nutritionists, fitness experts, and wellness companies" — is repeated across their store listings. That long development tail shows in the score breakdown: every weight is auditable inside the app. You can see exactly which layer dropped the score and by how much. That's rarer than you'd think in this category.

Where the app is genuinely strong: the personalization layer (allergen + diet profile reweighting), the alternative-product engine, the price-aware ranking, and the multi-profile feature for households. The independence claim — no brand pay-to-play, no per-product human override — is repeated explicitly on the listing pages and is rare in the consumer-rating category.

Where Xume is honestly weaker: geographic database depth. Coverage is strongest for Indian and major US packaged-goods catalogs. Niche European brands, regional Asian goods, and very-recent product launches are sometimes missing — users report submitting barcodes that get added within a few weeks. Pricing also draws complaints, particularly from emerging-market users who note the annual plan is reasonable but a monthly equivalent would help conversion. The free tier caps scans per month, which is a real wall for power users.

2017
Original launch as PlanMyFoodMumbai-based health-food rating app, App Store ID 1279728797
2019–22
Algorithm refinementSix-year R&D cycle with clinical and nutrition input
2024
Rebrand to Xume"Just xume it" — barcode-scan-first positioning, redesigned UI
2025
Score 2.0Predicted-taste meter, NOVA classification surfaced explicitly, price-aware swap ranking

Quick answers, honest where it counts.

Xume is not a calorie counter. It is a packaged-food rating engine. Scan a barcode and the proprietary algorithm returns a 0–100 score based on nutrition density, ingredient quality, the level of processing, additive load, and how well the product matches your dietary preferences. The score is color-coded red, orange, yellow, or green. If you also want gram-level calorie logging from photos of cooked meals, pair Xume with a dedicated tracker — they serve different jobs.
PlanMyFood, the company behind Xume, built the algorithm over roughly six years of R&D with input from doctors, nutritionists, fitness experts, and wellness companies. The score combines nutrient density, additive and ultra-processed-ingredient detection, allergen matching against your profile, and a predicted taste model. Crucially, no brand, manufacturer, or retailer can pay to override a score, and there are no human overrides on a per-product basis. The score is what the algorithm produced.
Coverage is strongest in India and in major United States packaged categories. Newer regional brands in Europe, Southeast Asia, and Latin America can be missing or behind on label changes. If a scan fails you can submit the barcode and a photo of the label — these get added to the queue and usually appear in the database within a few weeks. For a fully open community-edited alternative, projects like Open Food Facts cover wider geographic catalogs with less personalization.
Yes. The free tier gives you a limited number of scans per month, the basic 0–100 score, and the color code. Pro removes the scan cap, unlocks the full healthier-alternative recommendation engine, multi-profile household support, allergen alerts across profiles, and shopping-list export. Pricing in the US is roughly four to five dollars per month if billed monthly, with a cheaper annual plan. International pricing varies — and yes, several users from India have flagged that the rupee price feels steep for the local market.
Yes. You build a profile with your diet (vegan, vegetarian, keto, low-sugar, diabetic-friendly, etc.), allergens (peanut, gluten, dairy, soy, shellfish, etc.), and goals. The score is then personalized — a product that scores 78 for a low-sugar profile might score 51 for a strict keto profile, because the algorithm reweights nutrient ratios and ingredients for your context. You can also create multiple profiles inside Pro for different household members and switch between them at checkout.
MyFitnessPal is a calorie and macro tracker — different job, photo-based meal logging, huge food database. Yuka is the closest competitor — barcode scanner, NutriScore-style rating, additive penalty — and has a much larger European database, especially for French and German brands. Open Food Facts is the open-source community project Yuka and others build on top of; it is transparent and free but much less personalized. Xume's edge is the personalized scoring layer plus the ranked healthier-alternative recommendation, and its weakness today is geographic database depth outside India and the US.
PlanMyFood states publicly that brands, manufacturers, and e-commerce partners cannot pay to influence scores or recommendations. The ranking of alternative products is driven by health score first, then price. The company does earn affiliate revenue when users buy through suggested e-commerce links — that is the business model — but the order of suggested swaps is set by the algorithm, not by commission rates. You can verify this by comparing the algorithm's swap against the cheapest option for the same score in the database.
Live scoring needs internet because the database is server-side and constantly updated. Your scan history, saved products, and shopping lists are cached locally so you can review them offline. Barcode capture itself works offline — the lookup just queues until you reconnect.
Xume is available on the Apple App Store and Google Play in most regions. You can also visit the publisher PlanMyFood for the latest links and company information. This page is an independent affiliate review and reference site — we are not the official PlanMyFood website.

Scan the box. Trust the score.

Six years of R&D went into the algorithm. The free tier lets you try it on your pantry today — no card needed.

Xume is a consumer information and nutrition rating tool, not a medical device or a substitute for advice from a registered dietitian or physician. Scores are designed to help inform purchase decisions and reduce confusion at the shelf. They should not be used as the sole basis for managing a medical condition, treating an allergy, or making clinical nutrition decisions. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional for personalized dietary guidance.